Current replication
Spearman rank correlation
Not measuredNo current measurement is available in this registry.
Research study · 2019
Doctor’s Preference in Providing Medical Service for Patients in the Medical Alliance: A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment
Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.
Read the paper ↗01 / Human finding
What the study found
A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.
Answer-key review: Not reviewed
02 / Experiment design
Who chose, and what varied
- Country
- China
- Human respondents
- Not recorded
- Attributes
- 3
- Task
- discrete choice
03 / Synthetic replication
Registry replication results
Paper-era reference
2023 CLM mean Spearman ρ
Not measuredHistorical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.
Detailed replication evidence · 2026-10-31
Right direction on all 10 significant effects, partial ranking (ρ = 0.73); sizes not comparable (the paper reports logit coefficients).
Use it to screen which attributes move choice; sizes need the paper's respondent data.
- direction
- holds
- rank
- mixed
- size
- not comparable
Supported uses
- Screening which attributes move choice, and in which direction.
Limits to keep in view
- Ranking close levels against each other; the order diverges from humans.
- Effect sizes in the paper's units; only direction, rank and shape are compared.
Effects on a common scale
Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 2.9322. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.
| Attribute / level | Human | Human 95% half-width | Calibrated synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increment in working time per week: 1 h more | 1.400 | Not measured | 1.327 |
| Increment in working time per week: 2 h more | 1.010 | Not measured | 0.849 |
| Increment in working time per week: 3 h more | 0.700 | Not measured | 0.725 |
| Increment in working time per week: 4 h more | 0.460 | Not measured | 1.167 |
| Increment in working time per week: 5 h more (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Increment in the income per month: 10% more (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Increment in the income per month: 15% more | 0.290 | Not measured | 0.715 |
| Increment in the income per month: 20% more | 0.800 | Not measured | 0.367 |
| Increment in the income per month: 25% more | 0.890 | Not measured | 0.378 |
| Increment in the income per month: 30% more | 1.190 | Not measured | 0.925 |
| Location of working hospital: County (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Location of working hospital: Suburb | 0.310 | Not measured | 0.226 |
| Location of working hospital: Downtown | 0.750 | Not measured | 1.120 |
Subgroups · screen, not a result
Split by sex: 3 of 6 significant differences keep their direction in the simulation (19% to 81%)
screen, not a result. Each row is the female group’s effect minus the male group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.
- Sign agreement
- 3/6, 50%
- 95% interval
- 19% to 81%
- Shuffle null
- 51%, p 0.40
- Shape ρ
- 0.64, null p 0.17
- Scale ratio
- 1.59×
| Group | Simulated n | People n | ρ vs paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| female | 98 | not given | 0.22 |
| male | 97 | not given | 0.35 |
| Attribute / level | People Δ (95%) | Significant | Simulated Δ (own scale) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increment in working time per week: 4 h more | +0.49 ±0.36 | yes | -0.04 ±0.13 | opposite |
| Increment in working time per week: 3 h more | +0.64 ±0.38 | yes | +0.05 ±0.12 | same direction |
| Increment in working time per week: 2 h more | +0.74 ±0.36 | yes | -0.05 ±0.13 | opposite |
| Increment in working time per week: 1 h more | +0.76 ±0.36 | yes | -0.02 ±0.11 | opposite |
| Increment in the income per month: 15% more | +0.06 ±0.29 | no | -0.08 ±0.16 | not compared |
| Increment in the income per month: 20% more | +0.12 ±0.35 | no | +0.02 ±0.10 | not compared |
| Increment in the income per month: 25% more | -0.01 ±0.31 | no | -0.07 ±0.12 | not compared |
| Increment in the income per month: 30% more | +0.14 ±0.47 | no | -0.03 ±0.18 | not compared |
| Location of working hospital: Suburb | +0.46 ±0.33 | yes | +0.04 ±0.11 | same direction |
| Location of working hospital: Downtown | +0.90 ±0.41 | yes | +0.07 ±0.11 | same direction |
04 / Evidence and limitations
Follow the evidence
Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.
- missing parent paper url
- missing canonical pdf
- missing historic score
- missing resolved wandb run