Current replication
Spearman rank correlation
Not measuredNo current measurement is available in this registry.
Research study · 2024
Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.
Read the paper ↗01 / Human finding
A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.
Answer-key review: Not reviewed
02 / Experiment design
03 / Synthetic replication
Current replication
No current measurement is available in this registry.
Paper-era reference
Historical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.
Detailed replication evidence · 2026-11-04
Use it to screen which attributes move choice; sizes need the paper's respondent data, and confirm the 2 reversed effects with people.
Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 2.0729. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.
| Attribute / level | Human | Human 95% half-width | Calibrated synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cocoa distribution channel: Large agri-food companies (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Cocoa distribution channel: Small- and medium-sized enterprises | 0.255 | Not measured | 0.331 |
| Cocoa distribution channel: Agricultural cooperatives | 0.190 | Not measured | 0.316 |
| Cocoa distribution channel: Direct trade | 0.265 | Not measured | 0.224 |
| Environmental impact of cocoa cultivation: Reduction of deforestation (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Environmental impact of cocoa cultivation: Reduction of water pollution | -0.160 | Not measured | 0.129 |
| Environmental impact of cocoa cultivation: Reduction of soil erosion | -0.166 | Not measured | -0.041 |
| Environmental impact of cocoa cultivation: Reduction of GHG emissions | -0.139 | Not measured | 0.135 |
| Place of chocolate production: Global South (e.g., Ecuador) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Place of chocolate production: Switzerland | 0.675 | Not measured | 0.497 |
| Label: Organic cultivation (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Label: Fair trade | 0.069 | Not measured | 0.264 |
| Label: Humane working conditions | 0.029 | Not measured | 0.046 |
| Label: Farmer-owned | 0.137 | Not measured | 0.103 |
Subgroups · screen, not a result
screen, not a result. Each row is the male group’s effect minus the female group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.
| Group | Simulated n | People n | ρ vs paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| female | 146 | not given | – |
| male | 134 | not given | – |
| Attribute / level | People Δ (95%) | Significant | Simulated Δ (own scale) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Label: Fair trade | -0.08 ±0.19 | no | -0.05 ±0.09 | not compared |
| Label: Humane working conditions | -0.07 ±0.17 | no | +0.01 ±0.09 | not compared |
| Label: Farmer-owned | +0.02 ±0.19 | no | -0.03 ±0.11 | not compared |
| Place of chocolate production: Switzerland | -0.12 ±0.17 | no | -0.02 ±0.07 | not compared |
04 / Evidence and limitations
Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.