Current replication
Spearman rank correlation
Not measuredNo current measurement is available in this registry.
Research study · 2014
Beer and Organic Labels: Do Belgian Consumers Care?
Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.
Read the paper ↗01 / Human finding
What the study found
A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.
Answer-key review: Not reviewed
02 / Experiment design
Who chose, and what varied
- Country
- Belgium
- Human respondents
- Not recorded
- Attributes
- 6
- Task
- discrete choice
03 / Synthetic replication
Registry replication results
Paper-era reference
2023 CLM mean Spearman ρ
Not measuredHistorical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.
Detailed replication evidence · 2026-11-03
Wrong direction on 8 of 20 effects, partial ranking (ρ = 0.61); sizes not comparable (the paper reports logit coefficients).
Use it to generate hypotheses to test with people; sizes need the paper's respondent data, and confirm the 8 reversed effects with people.
- direction
- fails
- rank
- mixed
- size
- not comparable
Supported uses
- Nothing yet without human confirmation.
Limits to keep in view
- Ranking close levels against each other; the order diverges from humans.
- Decisions that hinge on the attributes whose direction flipped (listed below).
- Effect sizes in the paper's units; only direction, rank and shape are compared.
Effects on a common scale
Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 13.8682. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.
| Attribute / level | Human | Human 95% half-width | Calibrated synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of beer: Alcohol free beer (reference category) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Type of beer: Table beer | 1.533 | Not measured | 0.690 |
| Type of beer: Pilsner beer | 1.887 | Not measured | 1.526 |
| Type of beer: Beer of spontaneous fermentation | 2.378 | Not measured | 0.733 |
| Type of beer: Fruit beer | 1.295 | Not measured | -0.316 |
| Type of beer: Trappist beer | 2.387 | Not measured | 1.823 |
| Type of beer: Abbey beer | 2.493 | Not measured | 1.350 |
| Type of beer: Pale ale | 1.556 | Not measured | 0.626 |
| Type of beer: Small scale local beer | 2.792 | Not measured | 1.334 |
| Color: Amber (reference category) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Color: Dark | -0.115 | Not measured | -0.913 |
| Color: Pale | 0.129 | Not measured | -0.883 |
| Country of production: USA (reference category) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Country of production: UK | -0.003 | Not measured | 0.325 |
| Country of production: Belgium | 0.819 | Not measured | 6.939 |
| Organic label: No organic label (reference category) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Organic label: Organic label | 0.086 | Not measured | -1.002 |
| Packaging: Can (reference category) (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Packaging: On tap | 0.731 | Not measured | -0.105 |
| Packaging: Bottle | 0.758 | Not measured | 0.507 |
| Price (continuous variable): 2 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Price (continuous variable): 4 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL | -0.063 | Not measured | 0.163 |
| Price (continuous variable): 6 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL | -0.126 | Not measured | 0.336 |
| Price (continuous variable): 10 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL | -0.251 | Not measured | 0.064 |
| Price (continuous variable): 15 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL | -0.408 | Not measured | -0.343 |
| Price (continuous variable): 30 Euro for 6 portions of 25 cL | -0.879 | Not measured | -0.709 |
Subgroups · screen, not a result
Split by gender: no significant difference between the groups, so there is nothing to compare
screen, not a result. Each row is the female group’s effect minus the male group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.
- Sign agreement
- –
- 95% interval
- no interval
- Shuffle null
- –
- Shape ρ
- –
- Scale ratio
- –
| Group | Simulated n | People n | ρ vs paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| female | 174 | not given | – |
| male | 176 | not given | – |
| Attribute / level | People Δ (95%) | Significant | Simulated Δ (own scale) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic label: Organic label | -0.11 ±0.34 | no | +0.05 ±0.04 | not compared |
04 / Evidence and limitations
Follow the evidence
Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.
- missing parent paper url
- missing canonical pdf
- missing historic score
- missing resolved wandb run