subconscious.ai
← All studies

Research study · 2024

Preferences for Unguided Depression Prevention Among Health Professional Students: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.

Trung Tin Pham · Pham2026

Read the paper ↗

01 / Human finding

What the study found

A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.

Answer-key review: Not reviewed

02 / Experiment design

Who chose, and what varied

Country
Vietnam
Human respondents
Not recorded
Attributes
7
Task
discrete choice

03 / Synthetic replication

Registry replication results

Current replication

Spearman rank correlation

Not measured

No current measurement is available in this registry.

Paper-era reference

2023 CLM mean Spearman ρ

Not measured

Historical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.

Detailed replication evidence · 2026-10-31

Right direction on 10 of 12 effects, weak ranking (ρ = 0.60); sizes not comparable (the paper reports logit coefficients).

Use it to screen which attributes move choice; sizes need the paper's respondent data, and confirm the 2 reversed effects with people.

Inspect the measured run ↗

direction
mixed
rank
fails
size
not comparable

Supported uses

  • Nothing yet without human confirmation.

Limits to keep in view

  • Ranking close levels against each other; the order diverges from humans.
  • Decisions that hinge on the attributes whose direction flipped (listed below).
  • Effect sizes in the paper's units; only direction, rank and shape are compared.

Effects on a common scale

Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 5.8714. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.

● Human   ◆ Calibrated synthetic · Lines show human 95% intervals where available.
-1.3101.31Main contents: Advanced knowledge about depression interventionsMain contents: Advanced knowledge about dep…Main contents: Coping skills for depressionMain contents: Coping skills for depressionPrivacy: Anonymous participationPrivacy: Anonymous participationExpert support: Asynchronous supportExpert support: Asynchronous supportIncentives: Training pointsIncentives: Training pointsIncentives: Certificate of competencyIncentives: Certificate of competencyDelivery modality: WebsiteDelivery modality: WebsiteDelivery modality: Social mediaDelivery modality: Social mediaIntervention intensity: 1.5 hours/week for 4 weeksIntervention intensity: 1.5 hours/week for …Intervention intensity: 1 hour/week for 6 weeksIntervention intensity: 1 hour/week for 6 w…Out-of-pocket cost: 30 thousand VNDOut-of-pocket cost: 30 thousand VNDOut-of-pocket cost: 60 thousand VNDOut-of-pocket cost: 60 thousand VND
Human and calibrated synthetic effects
Attribute / levelHumanHuman 95% half-widthCalibrated synthetic
Main contents: General knowledge about depression (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Main contents: Advanced knowledge about depression interventions-0.065Not measured-1.193
Main contents: Coping skills for depression-0.121Not measured-0.166
Privacy: Professional-accessible privacy (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Privacy: Anonymous participation0.464Not measured0.319
Expert support: Synchronous support (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Expert support: Asynchronous support-0.385Not measured0.331
Incentives: None (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Incentives: Training points0.795Not measured0.029
Incentives: Certificate of competency1.118Not measured0.233
Delivery modality: Mobile application (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Delivery modality: Website-0.048Not measured-0.088
Delivery modality: Social media0.005Not measured-0.777
Intervention intensity: 3 hours/week for 2 weeks (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Intervention intensity: 1.5 hours/week for 4 weeks-0.022Not measured-0.148
Intervention intensity: 1 hour/week for 6 weeks0.078Not measured0.028
Out-of-pocket cost: Free of charge (reference)0.000Not measured0.000
Out-of-pocket cost: 30 thousand VND-0.540Not measured-0.455
Out-of-pocket cost: 60 thousand VND-1.080Not measured-0.953

Subgroups · screen, not a result

Split by gender: 0 of 1 significant differences keep their direction in the simulation (0% to 79%)

screen, not a result. Each row is the female group’s effect minus the male group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.

Sign agreement
0/1, 0%
95% interval
0% to 79%
Shuffle null
53%, p 0.54
Shape ρ
–
Scale ratio
–
Respondents per group
GroupSimulated nPeople nρ vs paper
female90not given–
male85not given–
Group differences: female minus male
Attribute / levelPeople Δ (95%)SignificantSimulated Δ (own scale)Direction
Privacy: Anonymous participation+0.13 ±0.09yes-0.00 ±0.07opposite

Interval: Wilson 95% on the significant differences. Shuffle null: groups reassigned at random among the simulated respondents. Scored from screen run cbd3188e-4633-4276-bdd8-e5cb7ac57567, W&B score ↗.

04 / Evidence and limitations

Follow the evidence

Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.

  • missing parent paper url
  • missing canonical pdf
  • missing historic score
  • missing resolved wandb run
Measurement provenance

Registry revision: 648f40378e9c. Estimator: ols.