Current replication
Spearman rank correlation
Not measuredNo current measurement is available in this registry.
Research study · 2010
Preferences and skills of Indian public sector teachers
Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.
Read the paper ↗01 / Human finding
What the study found
A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.
Answer-key review: Not reviewed
02 / Experiment design
Who chose, and what varied
- Country
- India
- Human respondents
- Not recorded
- Attributes
- 5
- Task
- discrete choice
03 / Synthetic replication
Registry replication results
Paper-era reference
2023 CLM mean Spearman ρ
Not measuredHistorical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.
Detailed replication evidence · 2026-11-02
Right direction on 8 of 9 effects, weak ranking (ρ = 0.60); sizes not comparable (the paper reports logit coefficients).
Use it to screen which attributes move choice; sizes need the paper's respondent data, and confirm the reversed effect with people.
- direction
- mixed
- rank
- fails
- size
- not comparable
Supported uses
- Nothing yet without human confirmation.
Limits to keep in view
- Ranking close levels against each other; the order diverges from humans.
- Decisions that hinge on the attributes whose direction flipped (listed below).
- Effect sizes in the paper's units; only direction, rank and shape are compared.
Effects on a common scale
Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 3.2006. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.
| Attribute / level | Human | Human 95% half-width | Calibrated synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location: Remote village (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Location: Village / Small town | 0.507 | Not measured | 0.903 |
| Location: Your home village / town | 0.658 | Not measured | 0.542 |
| Location: District capital area | 0.368 | Not measured | 1.115 |
| Contract: Fixed term contract, renewable every 7 years. (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Contract: Permanent, must transfer every 7 years. | 0.673 | Not measured | 0.511 |
| Transfers: Depend on connections and influence (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Transfers: Depend on merit | 0.940 | Not measured | 0.559 |
| Staff and pupils: 2 teachers, 75 pupils (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Pay: Rs. 13000 per month (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Pay: Rs. 17000 per month | 0.528 | Not measured | 0.602 |
| Pay: Rs. 21000 per month | 1.056 | Not measured | 0.474 |
| Contract: Permanent, possibility to transfer after 7 years. | 0.783 | Not measured | 0.884 |
| Staff and pupils: 2 teachers, 14 pupils | -0.128 | Not measured | 0.051 |
Subgroups · screen, not a result
Split by gender: 0 of 3 significant differences keep their direction in the simulation (0% to 56%)
screen, not a result. Each row is the female group’s effect minus the male group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.
- Sign agreement
- 0/3, 0%
- 95% interval
- 0% to 56%
- Shuffle null
- 53%, p 0.86
- Shape ρ
- –
- Scale ratio
- –
| Group | Simulated n | People n | ρ vs paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| female | 124 | not given | – |
| male | 110 | not given | – |
| Attribute / level | People Δ (95%) | Significant | Simulated Δ (own scale) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location: Village / Small town | +0.19 ±0.26 | no | -0.01 ±0.10 | not compared |
| Location: Your home village / town | +0.70 ±0.28 | yes | -0.02 ±0.09 | opposite |
| Location: District capital area | +0.56 ±0.27 | yes | -0.08 ±0.12 | opposite |
| Contract: Permanent, must transfer every 7 years. | -0.18 ±0.19 | no | -0.01 ±0.11 | not compared |
| Contract: Permanent, possibility to transfer after 7 years. | -0.07 ±0.28 | no | +0.04 ±0.09 | not compared |
| Transfers: Depend on merit | +0.22 ±0.21 | yes | -0.05 ±0.11 | opposite |
| Staff and pupils: 2 teachers, 14 pupils | +0.13 ±0.16 | no | -0.04 ±0.10 | not compared |
04 / Evidence and limitations
Follow the evidence
Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.
- missing parent paper url
- missing canonical pdf
- missing historic score
- missing resolved wandb run