Current replication
Spearman rank correlation
Not measuredNo current measurement is available in this registry.
Research study · 2023
A determination of patient preferences for China online outpatient follow-up clinics by using discrete choice experiment: an exploratory study
Explore the published experiment and its available replication evidence.
Read the paper ↗01 / Human finding
What the study found
A reviewed summary is not available in this registry. Consult the published paper for the original finding.
Answer-key review: Not reviewed
02 / Experiment design
Who chose, and what varied
- Country
- China
- Human respondents
- Not recorded
- Attributes
- 6
- Task
- discrete choice
03 / Synthetic replication
Registry replication results
Paper-era reference
2023 CLM mean Spearman ρ
Not measuredHistorical results use their original estimator and reference. They are not a matched comparison with the current run.
Detailed replication evidence · 2026-11-02
Right direction on all 8 significant effects, close ranking (ρ = 0.86); sizes not comparable (the paper reports logit coefficients).
Use it to screen and rank which attributes move choice; sizes need the paper's respondent data.
- direction
- holds
- rank
- holds
- size
- not comparable
Supported uses
- Screening which attributes move choice, and in which direction.
- Ranking attributes and levels by how strongly they move choice.
Limits to keep in view
- Effect sizes in the paper's units; only direction, rank and shape are compared.
Effects on a common scale
Human effects: logit coefficient. Synthetic effects are multiplied by the record’s calibration factor, k = 6.1405. Calibration aligns magnitude; it does not establish agreement in unadjusted effect sizes.
| Attribute / level | Human | Human 95% half-width | Calibrated synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of internet hospital: Tertiary Internet hospital [Reference] (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Type of internet hospital: Secondary Internet hospital | -0.237 | Not measured | -0.773 |
| Type of internet hospital: Primary (Community) Internet hospital | -0.466 | Not measured | -0.736 |
| Type of online doctor: First diagnosing doctor [Reference] (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Type of online doctor: Non-first diagnosing doctor at the patient’s first diagnosing hospital | -0.481 | Not measured | -0.042 |
| Type of online doctor: Non-first diagnosing doctor at the patient’s non-first diagnosing hospital | -0.845 | Not measured | -0.405 |
| Waiting time for an appointment: Today [Reference] (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Waiting time for an appointment: 3 days | -1.033 | Not measured | -0.623 |
| Waiting time for an appointment: A week | -1.790 | Not measured | -1.433 |
| Communication mode: Video consultation [Reference] (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Communication mode: Voice (telephone) consultation | -0.047 | Not measured | -0.378 |
| Communication mode: Image-text consultation | -0.260 | Not measured | -0.516 |
| Online payment method: Payment by medical insurance [Reference] (reference) | 0.000 | Not measured | 0.000 |
| Online payment method: Payment without medical insurance | -1.342 | Not measured | -1.595 |
Subgroups · screen, not a result
Split by gender: 1 of 1 significant differences keep their direction in the simulation (21% to 100%)
screen, not a result. Each row is the female group’s effect minus the male group’s, human in logit, simulated on the simulation’s own scale, so compare direction, not size. A Jev fast-small screen makes no comparison claim.
- Sign agreement
- 1/1, 100%
- 95% interval
- 21% to 100%
- Shuffle null
- 55%, p 0.19
- Shape ρ
- –
- Scale ratio
- –
| Group | Simulated n | People n | ρ vs paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| female | 96 | not given | – |
| male | 79 | not given | – |
| Attribute / level | People Δ (95%) | Significant | Simulated Δ (own scale) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting time for an appointment: 3 days | +0.31 no interval | yes | +0.03 ±0.09 | same direction |
| Type of online doctor: Non-first diagnosing doctor at the patient’s non-first diagnosing hospital | -0.23 no interval | no | -0.05 ±0.10 | not compared |
04 / Evidence and limitations
Follow the evidence
Missing results mean unmeasured, not zero agreement.
- missing parent paper url
- missing canonical pdf
- missing historic score
- missing resolved wandb run